Outcome
|
8
|
6
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
Students
will write well organized, cohesive papers.
|
Work functions well as a whole. Piece has a clear flow and a sense of purpose. Makes clear connections with novel | Response has either a strong lead, developed body, or satisfying conclusion, but not all three. Makes connections with the novel | Uneven.
Awkward or missing transitions. Weakly unified. Unclear connections to the novel |
Wanders.
Repetitive. Inconclusive. No connection to the novel. |
Incoherent and fragmentary. Student didn't write enough to judge. |
Students
will use appropriate voice and tone in writing.
|
Voice
is confident and appropriate. Consistently engaging. Active, not
passive voice. Natural. A strong sense of both authorship and
audience. Use of "I" is fine |
The speaker sounds as if he or she cares too little or too much about the topic. Or the voice fades in and out. Occasionally passive. | Tone is okay. But the paper could have been written by anyone. Apathetic or artificial. Overly formal or informal. | "I just want to get this over with." | Mechanical and cognitive problems so basic that tone doesn't even figure in. Student didn't write enough to judge. |
Students
will demonstrate original, creative writing.
|
Excellent use of imagery; similes; vivid, detailed descriptions; Surprises the reader with unusual associations, breaks conventions, thwarts expectations. | Some startling images, a few stunning associative leaps with a weak conclusion or lesser, more ordinary images and comparisons. Inconsistent. | Sentimental, predictable, or cliché. | Borrows ideas or images from popular culture in an unreflective way. | Cursory response. Obvious lack of motivation and/or poor understanding of the assignment. |
Monday, 4 June 2012
Imaginative/ Narrative Essay Criteria/ Rubric
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment